“We have a picture of a staff Christmas party taken over a year ago. There was no one to the right of the girls when it was taken, it’s pretty freaky and I am not too sure if it’s an over exposure of one of the girls. I thought you should have a look anyway. if you zoom in on the right of the girl you can see the girls face. It would be interesting to find out more.”
What do you think?Ā Comment and vote now!
April 12, 2009 at 1:21 pm |
Night-time shooting mode, long exposure and movement.
September 23, 2012 at 3:43 pm |
That’s exactly what i thought on first view of this pic. Definitely a long exposure time due to lack of flash.
April 12, 2009 at 6:59 pm |
It is not one of the girls. If you look carefully, you can see the person has a parting in her hair, also she looks like she is holding an orange juice.
April 13, 2009 at 11:23 am |
Looks like someone tried to jump into the picture behind the two girls at the last second and ended up all blurry.
May 31, 2010 at 2:55 pm |
That Ecactly what happend.
August 25, 2010 at 8:26 pm
I agree.
December 8, 2011 at 5:33 pm |
Me too
April 13, 2009 at 3:19 pm |
in the industry we call this motion blur. EG. the girl on the right sneezed just when the picture was taken. nice attempt tho. also nice girls.
April 13, 2009 at 11:31 pm |
There was NO ONE behind her, and she didnt sneeze!
April 13, 2009 at 11:42 pm |
I was there and there was certainly no sneezing, and directly behind is a wall, there no one jumping in the picture otherwise the girls would have turned to face the person jumping in. the image doesnt even look like any of the girls in our group. certainly a mystery.
October 3, 2010 at 10:20 pm |
I was there, too- the girls were in an hermetically sealed glass box, with no doors… so NOBODY jumped into the picture. And the two girls don’t suffer from allergies and took Benadryl anyway, so there was no sneezing.
It’s REAL!
May 1, 2012 at 7:20 pm
Partying in a sealed glass box with no doors? Yeah right! You weren’t there (nicknames and abbreviations can’t state stuff like that). The only thing REAL here is this motion-blurred person (not ghost).
April 14, 2009 at 9:09 am |
OK fine- but it could be either. however, lets face it. Ive seen millions of motion blur shots in my career. And call me cynical but its a little more likely it is motion blur than a supernatural creature from another world/dimension/the afterlife.
motion blur. NEXT!
April 15, 2009 at 2:14 pm |
Oh my!
Look at that!
Look!
They are hot. Uhh shawnties.
April 15, 2009 at 7:12 pm |
i have to admit but this is definatly a fake. it’s clear that the girl moved just as the picture was taken. X
April 16, 2009 at 1:24 pm |
Maybe a motion blur, maybe not. What strikes me, however, is that the figure to the right of those girls seems to have blond hair and her head appears to be tilted forward a little. Furthermore, her face is broader and flatter, making her look much older, to my mind, than those girls sitting next to her.
That said, I still don’t know what to think. Buit I am intrigued…
April 17, 2009 at 2:48 am |
This would have to be the LAMEST excuse for a ghost photo ever foisted on the public.
September 15, 2009 at 10:42 pm |
agreed
April 17, 2009 at 4:29 pm |
I don’t think it is a ghost. I think it is some kind of exposure problem on the photo. If you look above the head of the third girl on the right you can see the corner of the wall behind which is a repeat of the corner of the wall that is behind the second girl to the right of the photo.
April 18, 2009 at 10:27 pm |
Just to make you all aware, this was taken on a phone. Not sure if that helpa regarding focus etc….
April 24, 2009 at 9:57 pm |
Don’t phones usually pause before they take the photo? Mine does, there’d be time for someone to jump in or out of shot …
September 15, 2009 at 10:45 pm
i agreed with these conclusion too, i mean its too obvios some girl jumped n or out the fuckin picture. this is gay to think its a ghost you can see the bodyy of the what is call ghost its girl people.!
April 21, 2009 at 9:12 am |
I need to interview the subjects to see if they recall anything. Can I have the phone number of the girl on the left please ?
May 20, 2009 at 6:06 am |
you’re so pathetic… but whilst you are at it, I might as well interview the living girl on the right, just to make the investigation fair =D
April 22, 2009 at 2:06 pm |
I was gonna say that…girl on the left is hot…
April 22, 2009 at 5:28 pm |
Fast-moving real person and a crappy camera.
April 28, 2009 at 5:21 pm |
If the person wasn’t meant to be in the photo and was in fact a “ghost”, why is the camera at such an angle as if it were meant to include them? It’s just one of your mates who moved when you took a photo.
May 15, 2009 at 2:19 pm |
silly photo
May 19, 2009 at 5:29 am |
hey, doesn’t the ghost have sleeves while both the girls are sleeveless? motion blur? o.O
May 19, 2009 at 5:31 am |
do people sneeze like that?
May 20, 2009 at 5:11 am |
Hey! I know that girl. Use to date her Momma some time ago.
May 20, 2009 at 9:49 am |
camera phones still have shutters. MOTION BLUR. Dont argue with me im a pro. i make my living out of photography. one on left is hotter, btw.
NNNEEEEEXXXXXTTTTTT!!!!!!
August 21, 2009 at 5:23 pm |
HAHAHHAHA third girl ppl
she moved and thats what happend
August 21, 2009 at 5:46 pm |
I have no idea what happened.
September 15, 2009 at 2:08 pm |
My phone camera is terrible for motion blur and it is one of the better ones! 5 megapixels too which aint’ too bad for a camera on a phone.
if someone moves even slightly while the shutter is going, you get loads of “ghostly” images
trust me, i have about 100 of them š
September 15, 2009 at 2:09 pm |
oh and there are such things as “Photo Bombers” google it š
September 24, 2009 at 12:38 pm |
That girl was moving.
November 2, 2009 at 2:24 pm |
Truly pathetic.
December 1, 2009 at 1:53 pm |
I have loads of pics like that from nights out,the “photographer” was probably drunk and the (wants attention)”ghost” jumped into the frame
December 11, 2009 at 7:13 pm |
come on dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! did you have that much to drink?
February 8, 2010 at 9:56 pm |
You have two choices here.
1. Believe the submitter – “Guys I’m telling you there were only two people in that photo!”
2. Believe that there is a ghost in the photo. Of course, then you also have to believe that the photographer has no skills, as then subjects are too far to the left of the frame.
This is not an example of a believable picture of something paranormal.
April 4, 2010 at 12:45 am |
Who were your favorite relatives?
August 4, 2010 at 12:34 pm |
The girls are extremely hot š
September 24, 2010 at 2:47 am |
Well…
I have be into the paranormal for about 35 years and photography for about as long. On this one I would say real. Motion blur can cause some interesting photos, but for not one single part of the blur subject not to be in focus is very rare. Also. look at the girl on the right. On her left arm just above her elbow is the hair of the “ghost”, same color and almost transparent. The girl on the right has much shorter hair, it is very dark, not curly and her hair is in front of her shoulders, not hanging down her arm.
And for me, the girl on the left is cute. š
October 17, 2010 at 2:31 pm |
It looks almost like me. If I’d know thease girls or hang out whit them, Id say it’s me. But I don’t. Weard. =S
December 29, 2010 at 4:54 pm |
3 girls, haven’t ghost
January 28, 2011 at 5:22 pm |
Clearly a third person in the room
January 29, 2011 at 6:30 am |
Looks a lot like the server to me. The person looks like they were moving to try and get out of the shot (def something a server would do) Almost looks like shes grabbin at the glass (to refill it , clean it, ???) I know they said there was no one else, but maybe they didnt the person (and the person was trying not to be noticed!) IDK just a thought…I do believe in ghosts, so not saying this couldnt be one, like everyone else just postin an opinion.
June 24, 2011 at 12:08 pm |
Looks like the image of a Babushka to me!
December 16, 2011 at 5:44 pm |
That’s a weird click. The chubby one does not seem to fit in with the cool kids.
April 3, 2012 at 6:15 pm |
that is defenatly fake
April 8, 2013 at 6:03 pm |
Is this for real?
It’s blatantly someone who has tried to jump into the shot.
September 10, 2013 at 5:25 am |
I think it’s a ghost. Her hair is without style, no Friday night going out with the girls “look ” she is eerily displaced. Ghost, why not. The girls seem totally unaware of her…..
February 20, 2015 at 6:54 pm |
Can I have the phone number of the girl on the left? =)